Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Three Alternatives To The RSA Boycott
Articles

Three Alternatives To The RSA Boycott

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamJanuary 13, 2014Updated:May 8, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
RSA Boycott
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

With this year’s RSA Conference only 6 weeks away it’s notable that the conversation around the event doesn’t hinge on the most important speakers or research expected to be discussed, but rather an usual circumstance for an information security event: a boycott.

Due to the allegations that the NSA paid $10 million to RSA for their complicity in defaulting their Bsafe product to utilize the known-weakened Dual EC DRBG, numerous information security professionals have opted to bail on their speaking obligations as a form of protest. As of this writing, the list of people involved with this boycott is at 12, including speakers and panelists. The list of boycotters currently includes the likes of F-Secure’s Mikko Hypponen and the EFF’s Marcia Hofmann.

While the reasoning for each boycotter differs slightly, all of them are very clearly upset at what they (and many others) believe is nothing short of a complete betrayal of the consumers and organizations who have put trust into RSA to be a leader of information security. What’s not clear is whether a boycott is the most impactful way to really make a point towards this situation we find ourselves in. Let’s think about a few other roads that are viable to show disdain.

1) Make Your Party Into a “Backdoor Ball”

I’ll wait a minute for you to groan at that title… OK, good! The point is that depending on your power to impact your organization’s actions you could perhaps take you regular old RSA after-party and change it into one that focuses its attention towards making change.

For example, hold a silent auction with the proceeds going towards the EFF. Also, instead of buying bags of corporate swag, give everyone t-shirts that they can wear around the conference to show their anger towards the actions of RSA. This road could lead to more advocates that are informed of the situation and can stand with you to show how collectively upset the community is.

2) Fun With Badges & Pieces of Flair

The fact that RSA’s name (while their roots are still to be respected) is comically close to NSA seems to lend its self to the potential for some clever badge reworking. I’m sure your local hacker space could come up with some alternative badges to walk around with for the event or even ways to manipulate your official one.

Ever see people wear small ribbons on their shirts? Perhaps lapel pins to show allegiance? I’d bet seeing 10,000 people walking around with a similar statement would be quite impactful even if the act of doing so may seem small. This is one of those “the sum is greater than its parts” situations.

3) Fire Talks With a Mission

Breakout sessions and fire talks are quite common at many information security conferences these days. Typically, such events would provide a chance for newer speakers (or those otherwise not accepted to the main CFP) to have a chance to give a short presentation. What if RSA became a venue for such presentations but completely outside the desired scope of the organizers?

Imagine walking through a hallway and seeing 200 people standing around as a would-be boycotter gives a presentation on the deceit of RSA or otherwise gives those walking by a few earfuls of the anger they feel towards the NSA. This is the equivalent of an info sec sit-in and would surely gain attention by attendees and the press.

The Road Less Traveled

While these are just a few ideas, I’d charge readers with remembering that while it’s always reasonable to follow people you trust or admire down a path, consider what other avenues you have at your disposal and find alternative ways to make a difference. Ultimately I don’t think we’ll see a “normal” year at the conference by a long shot.

Mark Stanislav | Duo Security | @markstanislav

mark_stanislav

Bio: Mark Stanislav is the Security Evangelist for Duo Security, an Ann Arbor, Michigan-based start-up focused on two-factor authentication and mobile security. With a career spanning over a decade, Mark has worked within small business, academia, start-up, and corporate environments, primarily focused on Linux architecture, information security, and web application development.

Mark earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Networking & IT Administration and his Master of Science Degree in Technology Studies, focused on Information Assurance, both from Eastern Michigan University. During his time at EMU, Mark built the curriculum for two courses focused on Linux administration and taught as an Adjunct Lecturer for two years. Mark holds CISSP, Security+, Linux+, and CCSK certifications.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Thousands of UK Government Devices Lost or Stolen, Raising Cybersecurity Fears

June 24, 20254 Mins Read

Attackers Tricked IT Help Desks at M&S and Co-op into Resetting Passwords

May 7, 20252 Mins Read

EDR and Vendor Consolidation are a Losing Approach to Cybersecurity

March 7, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}